Integrative Epigenomic and High-Throughput Functional Enhancer Profiling Reveals Determinants of Enhancer Heterogeneity in Gastric Cancer. (Genome Med, Oct 2021)

Authors

Taotao Sheng # 1 2Shamaine Wei Ting Ho # 2 3Wen Fong Ooi 4Chang Xu 2 3Manjie Xing 2 4Nisha Padmanabhan 2Kie Kyon Huang 2Lijia Ma 5Mohana Ray 5Yu Amanda Guo 6Ngak Leng Sim 6Chukwuemeka George Anene-Nzelu 7 8 9 10Mei Mei Chang 6Milad Razavi-Mohseni 11Michael A Beer 11Roger Sik Yin Foo 7 8Raghav Sundar 2 12Yiong Huak Chan 13Angie Lay Keng Tan 2Xuewen Ong 2Anders Jacobsen Skanderup 6Kevin P White 14 15Sudhakar Jha 16 17 18 19Patrick Tan 20 21 22 23 24 25

Affiliations

1Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117596, Singapore.

2Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.

3Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117599, Singapore.

4Epigenetic and Epitranscriptomic Regulation, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, 138672, Singapore.

5The Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

6Precision Medicine and Population Genomics (Somatic), Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, 138672, Singapore.

7Cardiovascular Research Institute, National University Health System, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.

8Precision Medicine and Population Genomics (Germline), Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

9Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Canada.

10Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.

11Department of Biomedical Engineering and McKusick-Nathans Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.

12Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.

13Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.

14The Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. kevin@tempus.com.

15Tempus Labs, Chicago, USA. kevin@tempus.com.

16Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117596, Singapore. csisjha@nus.edu.sg.

17Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117599, Singapore. csisjha@nus.edu.sg.

18NUS Center for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117599, Singapore. csisjha@nus.edu.sg.

19Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA. csisjha@nus.edu.sg.

20Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, 169857, Singapore. gmstanp@duke-nus.edu.sg.

21Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117599, Singapore. gmstanp@duke-nus.edu.sg.

22Epigenetic and Epitranscriptomic Regulation, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, 138672, Singapore. gmstanp@duke-nus.edu.sg.

23SingHealth/Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, 168752, Singapore. gmstanp@duke-nus.edu.sg.

24Department of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117593, Singapore. gmstanp@duke-nus.edu.sg.

25Singapore Gastric Cancer Consortium, Singapore, 119228, Singapore. gmstanp@duke-nus.edu.sg.

#Contributed equally.

Abstract
Background: Enhancers are distal cis-regulatory elements required for cell-specific gene expression and cell fate determination. In cancer, enhancer variation has been proposed as a major cause of inter-patient heterogeneity-however, most predicted enhancer regions remain to be functionally tested.

Methods: We analyzed 132 epigenomic histone modification profiles of 18 primary gastric cancer (GC) samples, 18 normal gastric tissues, and 28 GC cell lines using Nano-ChIP-seq technology. We applied Capture-based Self-Transcribing Active Regulatory Region sequencing (CapSTARR-seq) to assess functional enhancer activity. An Activity-by-contact (ABC) model was employed to explore the effects of histone acetylation and CapSTARR-seq levels on enhancer-promoter interactions.

Results: We report a comprehensive catalog of 75,730 recurrent predicted enhancers, the majority of which are GC-associated in vivo (> 50,000) and associated with lower somatic mutation rates inferred by whole-genome sequencing. Applying CapSTARR-seq to the enhancer catalog, we observed significant correlations between CapSTARR-seq functional activity and H3K27ac/H3K4me1 levels. Super-enhancer regions exhibited increased CapSTARR-seq signals compared to regular enhancers, even when decoupled from native chromatin contexture. We show that combining histone modification and CapSTARR-seq functional enhancer data improves the prediction of enhancer-promoter interactions and pinpointing of germline single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), and trans-acting TFs involved in GC expression. We identified cancer-relevant genes (ING1, ARL4C) whose expression between patients is influenced by enhancer differences in genomic copy number and germline SNPs, and HNF4? as a master trans-acting factor associated with GC enhancer heterogeneity.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that combining histone modification and functional assay data may provide a more accurate metric to assess enhancer activity than either platform individually, providing insights into the relative contribution of genetic (cis) and regulatory (trans) mechanisms to GC enhancer functional heterogeneity.

Keywords: CapSTARR-seq; Enhancer heterogeneity; Enhancer landscape; Enhancer-promoter interactions; Gastric cancer.

© 2021. The Author(s).

PMID: 34635154

PMCID: PMC8504099

DOI: 10.1186/s13073-021-00970-3